Confrontational Oligarchysv.NonConfrontational Democracys Defining Of Everything Incl COs Pedophilia

Random promotion may be best,
​ research suggests.

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2010/nov/01/random-promotion-research

Narrow definitions of
worth, as from narrow definitions of
character, including narrow definitions
of intelligence, and cultural choice
reflecting such, and offsets, natural
& suited to such stages of development.
Random per se frankly sounds
concept-pushy; but, this is "garchically
caste" and actually described as a kind
of "nazi" think in the movie (academic
use claimed,)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSZtoveaa0A

and all that serves one
apparent stage of development over
another.
but it's a recognizer of the essentialness
of cultural choices , and, argued here, how
it's now understandable, only a democratic
underpinning creates a flow of science
work that retains a "rightful" human character.
one way to know you have it right's knowing
not doing it the trump culture way.
This evidently was a winner at a Harvard
special-Nobel Awards-featuring the super
creative ceremony.
"Brainstorming" per se's a known powerful
group behavior, and democratic structure
would seem better suited than top down
'garchs' followers.
Not understanding this actually casts
democratic bi-directionality (cultural choices
& science, but the above's a math proof,
and the cultural choices are thus
obviously also math) adrift, half the time,
with only top down "control's" (oligarchy)
whim doing both of these: getting
particularly focused control related power
monopolized, and then deciding, how
benevolent toward the full community they
may be, and also how destructive to the
full community they find it convenient
​being.
warning fish violence:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDeNNNPzUlg

Science From Cultural Choices: Here, Confrontational Oligarchies,Not Non-Confrontational Democracies
http://www.openupper.com/page.html?p=9871b9


the website will be framing
in regard to many assumptions
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/humans-are-still-mating-with-neandertals/
and many of those will be
perfectly valid but reflecting
tiny variations in cultural choice-
epigenetic offset pairs; this website's
arguing & advocating only democracy
& good intentions assures a "right"
human result in how we pursue
science.
dashing isolated beliefs and science
assumptions in the end is not
anti-religion but rather appears
suggestive of stages of development
in "religion" - science bi-directionality.
in the end, there's a "belief" in democracy
(and good intentions, and that's intended
being meant specifically--namely,
understanding humans better means the
gateway to the next generation, women,
should consider larger-more-expansive-
happier futures by not thinking of people
in narrow terms (and really vice versa for
males;) yet, so long as everyone "believes
in," or "understands" the democracy/good
intentions-science connection, then,
particular trait preferences collectively
can be part of a successful result.

most in popultional issues look at
population size.
this website applies a 2-part response:
the iroquois confederation
(league of nations,) and explains how
that variation provides a likelier more
practical (and successful) 2-state
israel-palestine solution; also, it applies
​the obvious kerala, india experience.

note, in many locations, populationally,
the issue's not too many but too few
(the upside down population.)

but this website identifies a cultural choices
-populational-epigenetic adaptation process
relative to cultural choices on the level
of confrontational oligarchy v
non-confrontational democracy, and it
further finds, that any such offsetting will
then be simply a matter of what is right
​for that manner of cultural choice selection.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=iq+and+the+quest+for+intelligence+warwick&t=h_&ia=web
so far for myself only av. in hard copy

cultural choices and concomitant decision trees,
framed by prior choices (choices provided culturally
can reflect preceding oligarchy or democracy)
driverless. gmo's.
http://fooledbyrandomness.com/pp2.pdf

https://www.medicaldaily.com/how-smart-are-you-really-iq-tests-may-be-wrong-there-are-possibly-9-types-396292

i THINK this is about unwitting
intellectual genocide:
https://phys.org/news/2019-02-faculty-beliefs-intelligence-racial-gaps.html?utm_source=menu&utm_medium=link&utm_campaign=item-menu

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=kenneth+clark%27s+doll+experiment&t=h_&ia=web

gay males are more not less macho:
slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/chatterbox/2001/03/does_being_a_jock_make_a_man_gay.html
(see at "hypermasculine")

CONFRONTATIONAL OLIGARCHY
PRODUCES MORE...NATURALLY,
APPROPRIATELY, GAY PERSONS,
ADAPTIVELY AS EXTRA/MORE MACHO,
FOR WAR & HUNTING

IT PREDISPOSES PEDOPHILIC
PRODUCTION BY INSISTING ON
BABY MAKING FROM FIRST PUBERTY
OF FEMALES, CONNECTING WITH AN
ACCUMULATIVE FACTOR.
PEDOPHILIA'S DISTINCT FROM
HOMOSEXUALITY IN THAT IT IS
PROVED CORRELATED WITH THE
APATHIC PERSONALITY.
BUT OTHERWISE, THERE ARE DISTINCT
METHOD OF OPERATION CROSS-OVERS
(SIMILARITIES,) WITH HIGHER
FECUNDITY (IN WOMEN) BEGINNING
FROM EARLIEST PUBERTY IMPREGNATION,
FOR THE PURPOSE OF LONGER BIRTH
STRINGS.
THERE, TOWARD THE LATTER PART OF
SAID BIRTH STRINGS, COMES A SLIGHTLY
RAISED LIKELIHOOD OF GAY BIRTHS.

This is why our oligarchic elite's pedophilic.
It also explains.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/johann-hari/the-strange-strange-story_b_136697.html

https://phys.org/news/2019-02-high-iqs-wont-ecological-disasters.html

http://openupper.com/page.html?p=6923b5

https://twishort.com/GSZmc

https://twishort.com/9iknc

Caste-thought from narrow & naive definitions of
worth deviating from birthright only adds to the
culture of put-down, recognition denial & arrogance.


04:20 PM - 27 Feb 19 via Twishort website

Reply Retweet